Jane Garner

55 papers receiving 470 citations

Peers

Jane Garner
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Library and Information Sciences 107
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 12
  • Communication 43
  • Clinical Psychology 113
  • General Health Professions 125
Replace Mark Winston with:
Mark Winston United States
Linda Cooper United Kingdom
Karen Brown United States
Helen Greenwood United Kingdom
Daniel Callahan United States
Intan Azura Mokhtar Singapore
Sarah Clark United States
Evan K. Perrault United States
Alan O’Rourke United Kingdom
Kai Kuang United States
Jane Garner relative to Mark Winston United States Mark Winston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Mark Winston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Garner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Garner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Garner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Garner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Garner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Garner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Garner. The network helps show where Jane Garner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Garner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Garner Line = papers co-authored together Jane Garner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002128
2 200447
3 202136
4 202026
5
Television News and Presidential Campaigns: The Legitimization of Televised Political Advertising.
199022
6 199821
7 200119
8 200217
9 200117
10 202115
11 200313
12 199713
13 200813
14 202212
15 202011
16 202111
17 202310
18 202210
19 202210
20 20179

About Jane Garner

Jane Garner is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Information Systems, having authored 63 papers that have together received 593 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Administration (18 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (9 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (4 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (3 papers), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (3 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (107 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (12 citations), Communication (43 citations), Clinical Psychology (113 citations) and General Health Professions (125 citations). Jane Garner has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Philip Hider, Simon Wakeling, Hamid R. Jamali, Sandra Evans, Mark Ardern, Karen Bell, Yazdan Mansourian, Holly Randell‐Moon, Ruth Porter and Sarah Black. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, The Library Quarterly, Public Library Quarterly, Library Management and Journal of Library Administration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact