Jane Flax
Impact in
- General Psychology top 2%
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Gender Politics and Representation
Papers in
-
- Race, History, and American Society 3
-
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 3
- Co-authors
- Fredric Jameson (1 shared paper)Martin Jay (1 shared paper)bell hooks (1 shared paper)Susan Bordo (1 shared paper)Judith Butler (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Signs (5 papers)Contemporary Psychoanalysis (3 papers)Feminist Studies (2 papers)Psychoanalytic Dialogues (2 papers)The Journal of Philosophy (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jane Flax
29 papers receiving 811 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- General Psychology 62
- Gender Studies 303
- Philosophy 158
- Sociology and Political Science 483
- Literature and Literary Theory 111
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Flax
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Flax's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Flax with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Flax more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Flax
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Flax. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Flax. The network helps show where Jane Flax may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Jane Flax, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1987 | 491 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 154 | |
| 3 | Disputed Subjects : Essays on Psychoanalysis, Politics and Philosophy | 1993 | 134 |
| 4 | 1978 | 79 | |
| 5 | 1992 | 64 | |
| 6 | 1981 | 46 | |
| 7 | 1981 | 40 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 24 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 23 | |
| 10 | 1988 | 21 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 14 | |
| 12 | 1993 | 13 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 10 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 8 | |
| 16 | Psicoanálisis y feminismo: pensamientos fragmentarios | 1995 | 5 |
| 17 | 1981 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1978 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 3 |
About Jane Flax
Jane Flax is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, Literature and Literary Theory and Philosophy, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (3 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (2 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper) and Themes in Literature Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (62 citations), Gender Studies (303 citations), Philosophy (158 citations), Sociology and Political Science (483 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (111 citations). Jane Flax has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Fredric Jameson, Martin Jay, bell hooks, Susan Bordo and Judith Butler. Their work appears in journals such as Signs, Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Feminist Studies, Psychoanalytic Dialogues and The Journal of Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.