Contemporary Psychoanalysis

14.9k citations
1.7k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
    • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
    • Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
    • Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy
    • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
    • Child Therapy and Development
    • Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Papers in

    • Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology 333
    • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 927
    • Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics 185
    • Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy 125
    • Child Therapy and Development 66
    • Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics 58
    • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology 57

Contemporary Psychoanalysis

1.1k papers receiving 8.1k citations

Peers

Contemporary Psychoanalysis
Comparison fields: 5 of 191
  • General Psychology 3.3k
  • Clinical Psychology 11.3k
  • Philosophy 1.9k
  • Social Psychology 2.9k
  • Cultural Studies 882
Replace Psychoanalytic Dialogues with:
Psychoanalytic Dialogues United States
Psychoanalytic Inquiry United States
Psychoanalytic Psychology United States
The Psychoanalytic Quarterly United States
Journal of Analytical Psychology United States
The International Journal of Psychoanalysis United States
Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences United States
The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child United States
International Journal of Group Psychotherapy United States
Theory & Psychology United States
Contemporary Psychoanalysis relative to Psychoanalytic Dialogues United States Psychoanalytic Dialogues's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Psychoanalytic Dialogues · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Psychoanalysis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Psychoanalysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Psychoanalysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Psychoanalysis more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Contemporary Psychoanalysis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Psychoanalysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Psychoanalysis.

About Contemporary Psychoanalysis

The 1.7k papers published in Contemporary Psychoanalysis in the last decades have received a total of 14.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Contemporary Psychoanalysis usually cover General Psychology (333 papers), Clinical Psychology (1.0k papers), Philosophy (175 papers), Social Psychology (219 papers) and Applied Psychology (38 papers) specifically the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (927 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (333 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (185 papers), Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy (125 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (118 papers), Child Therapy and Development (66 papers), Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (58 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Psychoanalysis are Philip M. Bromberg, Donnel B. Stern, Irwin Z. Hoffman, Edgar A. Levenson, Emmanuel Ghent, James S. Grotstein, Darlene Bregman Ehrenberg, Jay Greenberg, Jessica Benjamin and Alan L. Grey.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact