Psychoanalytic Dialogues

1.7k papers and 15.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Psychoanalytic Dialogues in the last decades have received a total of 15.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychoanalytic Dialogues usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.3k papers), General Psychology (380 papers) and Philosophy (288 papers) specifically the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1.2k papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (380 papers) and Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy (296 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychoanalytic Dialogues are Lewis Aron, Irwin Z. Hoffman, Jody Messier Davies, Philip M. Bromberg, Jody Messler Davies, Anthony Bass, Adrienne Harris, Stephen Seligman, Esther Thelen and Muriel Dimen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychoanalytic Dialogues

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychoanalytic Dialogues. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychoanalytic Dialogues.

Countries where authors publish in Psychoanalytic Dialogues

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychoanalytic Dialogues. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychoanalytic Dialogues with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychoanalytic Dialogues more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025