Jane E. Smith

2.7k citations
51 papers · 2.0k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Jane E. Smith

51 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Jane E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Insect Science 991
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 502
  • Plant Science 1.5k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 482
  • Soil Science 224
Replace Peggy Ann Schultz with:
Peggy Ann Schultz United States
Michael P. Amaranthus United States
Laura M. Suz United Kingdom
Kadri Koorem Estonia
Adriana Corrales United States
A. Dahlberg Sweden
Gwen‐Aëlle Grelet New Zealand
Paul Widden Canada
Yosuke Matsuda Japan
Ülle Reier Estonia
Jane E. Smith relative to Peggy Ann Schultz United States Peggy Ann Schultz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Peggy Ann Schultz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane E. Smith. The network helps show where Jane E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Jane E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009294
2 2002173
3 1997100
4 200497
5 199496
6 200080
7 200579
8 199978
9 200972
10 200466
11 201663
12 200953
13 200352
14 199550
15 200149
16 199843
17 201142
18 199739
19 199736
20 200036

About Jane E. Smith

Jane E. Smith is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 51 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (27 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (23 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (8 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (8 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (8 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (6 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (991 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (502 citations), Plant Science (1.5k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (482 citations) and Soil Science (224 citations). Jane E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Randy Molina, Donaraye McKay, Daniel L. Luoma, Nancy Smith Weber, David A. Perry, Hugues B. Massicotte, Frank Menzel, Suzanne W. Simard, Manuela Huso and Joseph W. Spatafora. Their work appears in journals such as Mycorrhiza, Forest Ecology and Management, New Phytologist, Canadian Journal of Forest Research and Plant and Soil.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact