Jane E. McCormack

26 papers receiving 529 citations

Peers

Jane E. McCormack
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Internal Medicine 77
  • Emergency Medicine 151
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 49
  • Neurology 69
  • Surgery 107
Replace Lisa Ferrigno with:
Lisa Ferrigno United States
Nicolas Melo United States
Richard D. Catalano United States
Jayun Cho South Korea
Karla S. Ahrns United States
Jason Murry United States
Thomas J. Rohs United States
Naisan Garraway Canada
Benjamin W. Dart United States
Alice A. Gervasini United States
Jane E. McCormack relative to Lisa Ferrigno United States Lisa Ferrigno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.1×
Lisa Ferrigno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane E. McCormack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane E. McCormack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane E. McCormack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane E. McCormack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane E. McCormack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane E. McCormack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane E. McCormack. The network helps show where Jane E. McCormack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane E. McCormack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane E. McCormack Line = papers co-authored together Jane E. McCormack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200667
2 201065
3 200554
4 201138
5 200734
6 200931
7 201630
8 201630
9 201429
10 201727
11 201522
12 201722
13 201617
14 201513
15 201812
16 201711
17 201811
18 19998
19 20088
20 20147

About Jane E. McCormack

Jane E. McCormack is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Surgery, Internal Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 555 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (11 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (6 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (3 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (2 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Vascular Procedures and Complications (2 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (1 paper) and Blood transfusion and management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (77 citations), Emergency Medicine (151 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (49 citations), Neurology (69 citations) and Surgery (107 citations). Jane E. McCormack has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Marc J. Shapiro, Emily C. Huang, James A. Vosswinkel, Randeep Singh Jawa, Thomas Kin Man Lee, Daniel N. Rutigliano, Adam J. Singer, Richard J. Scriven, Michelle C. Azu and Henry C. Thode. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Surgical Research, The American Journal of Surgery, The American Surgeon, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society and The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact