Jane E. Bostick

1.2k citations
13 papers · 977 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jane E. Bostick

12 papers receiving 899 citations

Peers

Jane E. Bostick
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • General Health Professions 782
  • Research and Theory 93
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 35
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 21
  • Health Information Management 56
Replace Ann Karin Helgesen with:
Ann Karin Helgesen Norway
Vigdis Abrahamsen Grøndahl Norway
Elena O. Siegel United States
Jill Scott United States
Mary Zwygart-Stauffacher United States
Nancy Matthew‐Maich Canada
Deborah A. Lekan United States
María Aparecida Vieira Brazil
Christine Caffrey United States
Kristin Alstveit Laugaland Norway
Jane E. Bostick relative to Ann Karin Helgesen Norway Ann Karin Helgesen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
Ann Karin Helgesen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane E. Bostick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane E. Bostick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane E. Bostick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane E. Bostick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane E. Bostick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane E. Bostick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane E. Bostick. The network helps show where Jane E. Bostick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Jane E. Bostick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane E. Bostick Line = papers co-authored together Jane E. Bostick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2006324
2 2004184
3 2001140
4 1999112
5 200474
6 200653
7 200034
8 200626
9 200321
10 20054
11 20033
12
Impact of Design Interventions in Nursing Home on Residents with Dementia, Their Families, and the Staff
20012
13
Nursing Quality Measurement: A Review of Nursing Studies 1995-2000
20020

About Jane E. Bostick

Jane E. Bostick is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Research and Theory, Health Information Management, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 977 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (9 papers), Nursing education and management (3 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (3 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (1 paper), Aging and Gerontology Research (1 paper) and Health, Education, and Aging (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (782 citations), Research and Theory (93 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (35 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (21 citations) and Health Information Management (56 citations). Jane E. Bostick has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Marilyn Rantz, Marcia K. Flesner, C. Jo Riggs, Vicki S. Conn, David R. Mehr, Rose Porter, Lanis L. Hicks, Gregory F. Petroski, Richard Madsen and Mary Zwygart-Stauffacher. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nursing Care Quality, The Gerontologist, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Journal of Professional Nursing and Journal of Housing for the Elderly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact