Jane Denton

425 citations
29 papers · 279 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Denton

26 papers receiving 265 citations

Peers

Jane Denton
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 161
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 62
  • Reproductive Medicine 45
  • Demography 28
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 28
Replace A. Cook with:
A. Cook United Kingdom
P. Sarkar United Kingdom
P Benvenuti Italy
Sônia Maria Motta Palma Brazil
Emma Bränn Sweden
Mohamed Adel El-Hadidy Egypt
John Kelly United Kingdom
Marianne Wikman Sweden
Corrie Goldfinger Canada
Katherine Daly United States
Jane Denton relative to A. Cook United Kingdom A. Cook's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
A. Cook · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Denton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Denton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Denton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Denton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Denton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Denton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Denton. The network helps show where Jane Denton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Denton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Denton Line = papers co-authored together Jane Denton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201040
2 200634
3 201032
4 202125
5 200723
6 197417
7 199713
8 201811
9 201211
10 202111
11
Twins and more--2. Practical aspects of parenting in the early years.
20059
12
Infertility : nursing and caring
19958
13 20116
14
The nurse's role in treating fertility problems.
19986
15
One too many?: Families with multiple births
20185
16 20214
17 20194
18 20213
19 20013
20 20183

About Jane Denton

Jane Denton is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Epidemiology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 279 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (11 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (4 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (4 papers), Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (4 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (3 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (3 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (161 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (62 citations), Reproductive Medicine (45 citations), Demography (28 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (28 citations). Jane Denton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Brenda Leese, Julie Lanigan, C. J. Edmonds, Atul Singhal, M. H. Rogers, Elizabeth Isaacs, Paul Gringras, Alan Lucas, Merryl Harvey and Anthony E. Bourgeois. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Twin Research and Human Genetics, Health Technology Assessment, PLoS Medicine and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact