Jane Demmen

13 papers receiving 522 citations

Peers

Jane Demmen
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 324
  • Language and Linguistics 207
  • Literature and Literary Theory 185
  • Communication 65
  • Linguistics and Language 42
Replace Karen Grainger with:
Karen Grainger United Kingdom
Dennis Tay Hong Kong
Matthew T. Prior United States
Chase Wesley Raymond United States
Traci S. Curl United Kingdom
Reza Zabihi Iran
Elise Kärkkäinen Finland
Irene Koshik United States
Mia Halonen Finland
Alexander Z. Guiora United States
Jane Demmen relative to Karen Grainger United Kingdom Karen Grainger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Karen Grainger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Demmen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Demmen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Demmen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Demmen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Demmen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Demmen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Demmen. The network helps show where Jane Demmen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Jane Demmen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Demmen Line = papers co-authored together Jane Demmen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2016198
2 2015186
3 201572
4 201163
5 201522
6 201715
7 201311
8 20207
9 20206
10 20215
11 20182
12 20122
13 20222
14 20180
15
The development of play-texts:from manuscript to print
20110

About Jane Demmen

Jane Demmen is a scholar working on Linguistics and Language, Literature and Literary Theory, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Language and Linguistics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Linguistic Variation and Morphology (5 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers), Authorship Attribution and Profiling (3 papers), Gender Studies in Language (3 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (2 papers), Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism (2 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (2 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (324 citations), Language and Linguistics (207 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (185 citations), Communication (65 citations) and Linguistics and Language (42 citations). Jane Demmen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Elena Semino, Zsófia Demjén, Jonathan Culpeper, Paul Rayson, Andrew Hardie, Veronika Koller, Sheila Payne, Ursula Lutzky, Alistair Baron and Scott Piao. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Historical Pragmatics, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, Computer Speech & Language, Open Heart and Applied Linguistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact