Jane Dacre

3.1k citations
82 papers · 2.0k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Dacre

77 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Jane Dacre
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Family Practice 106
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 711
  • Gender Studies 143
  • Rheumatology 207
  • Emergency Medical Services 93
Replace Christopher M. Wittich with:
Christopher M. Wittich United States
Susan Humphrey‐Murto Canada
Kent J. DeZee United States
Gregory C. Kane United States
Richard W. Schwartz United States
Amy S. Oxentenko United States
Patricia B. Burns United States
Min‐Woong Sohn United States
Lena Ring Sweden
Salman Yousuf Guraya United Arab Emirates
Jane Dacre relative to Christopher M. Wittich United States Christopher M. Wittich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Christopher M. Wittich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Dacre

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Dacre's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Dacre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Dacre more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Dacre

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Dacre. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Dacre. The network helps show where Jane Dacre may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Dacre, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Dacre Line = papers co-authored together Jane Dacre links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015238
2 2003134
3 2000111
4 2003110
5 200699
6 200893
7 200585
8 201381
9 200977
10 200776
11 201170
12 200756
13 198854
14
Every breath we take: The lifelong impact of air pollution, Report of a working party.
201652
15 201349
16 201547
17 200747
18 198640
19 201639
20 200537

About Jane Dacre

Jane Dacre is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Gender Studies, Family Practice and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 82 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (28 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (18 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (11 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (9 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (7 papers), Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Healthcare Systems and Challenges (4 papers) and Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (106 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (711 citations), Gender Studies (143 citations), Rheumatology (207 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (93 citations). Jane Dacre has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Katherine Woolf, I. C. McManus, Alison Jones, Judith Cave, Richard Wakeford, Henry Potts, Iftikhar Ul Haq, Eileen Murphy, Andrew Elder and Inam Haq. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medical Education, Clinical Medicine, The Clinical Teacher, Postgraduate Medical Journal and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact