Jane Ann Moore

18 papers receiving 575 citations

Peers

Jane Ann Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Reproductive Medicine 169
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 190
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 22
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 41
  • Gastroenterology 25
Replace Anna L. Stout with:
Anna L. Stout United States
Carolyn J. Gibson United States
Venkatram Padmalatha India
Bılge Burçak Annagür Türkiye
Rhiannon Kate Patten Australia
Jeanne Leventhal Alexander United States
Galit Levi Dunietz United States
Priya Kannan Hong Kong
Jonathan L. Richardson United Kingdom
Thomas J. Fahy Ireland
Jane Ann Moore relative to Anna L. Stout United States Anna L. Stout's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12×
Anna L. Stout · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Ann Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Ann Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Ann Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Ann Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Ann Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Ann Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Ann Moore. The network helps show where Jane Ann Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Jane Ann Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Ann Moore Line = papers co-authored together Jane Ann Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011154
2 201284
3 200060
4 199857
5 200746
6 201144
7 197434
8 201833
9 201624
10 200221
11 201619
12 200817
13 20055
14 20084
15 20142
16 20171
17
New ways, old ways: Aboriginal education and belonging
20121
18 20001
19 20051
20 20160

About Jane Ann Moore

Jane Ann Moore is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Dermatology, History and Gastroenterology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (5 papers), Menstrual Health and Disorders (4 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (2 papers), American History and Culture (2 papers), Education Systems and Policy (2 papers) and Mormonism, Religion, and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (169 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (190 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (22 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (41 citations) and Gastroenterology (25 citations). Jane Ann Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Kennedy, Irene Tracey, Katy Vincent, Stephen M. Kennedy, Charlotte Jane Stagg, Catherine Elizabeth Warnaby, David J. Barlow, Derek P. Jewell, Stephen Kennedy and Lucy-Jane Davis. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, The Lancet, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Health Expectations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact