Jane Anau
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- David Arterburn (21 shared papers)Karen J. Coleman (10 shared papers)Mary Kay Theis (10 shared papers)Andrea J. Cook (13 shared papers)Andy Bogart (3 shared papers)David Fisher (3 shared papers)Patrick J. O’Connor (3 shared papers)Emily B. Schroeder (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Annals of Internal Medicine (3 papers)JAMA Surgery (2 papers)International Journal of Obesity (2 papers)JAMA (1 paper)Movement Disorders (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
Jane Anau
23 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Jane Anau's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Pharmacy 177
- Surgery 729
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 216
- Physiology 329
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 145
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Anau
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Anau's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Anau with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Anau more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Anau
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Anau. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Anau. The network helps show where Jane Anau may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Anau, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Bariatric Procedures for Weight Loss Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 209 |
| 2 | 2018 | 195 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 141 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 108 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 80 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 76 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 62 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 57 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 37 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 18 | Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Bariatric Procedures for Weight Loss | 2018 | 5 |
| 19 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 2 |
About Jane Anau
Jane Anau is a scholar working on Surgery, Pharmacy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Transportation and Health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (12 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (9 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (7 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (5 papers), Body Contouring and Surgery (5 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (3 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (177 citations), Surgery (729 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (216 citations), Physiology (329 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (145 citations). Jane Anau has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include David Arterburn, Karen J. Coleman, Mary Kay Theis, Andrea J. Cook, Andy Bogart, David Fisher, Patrick J. O’Connor, Emily B. Schroeder, Rebecca O’Brien and Sebastien Haneuse. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, JAMA Surgery, International Journal of Obesity, JAMA and Movement Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.