Cheri Janning
Impact in
Papers in
- Surgery 7
- Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes 6
- Hip and Femur Fractures 1
-
- Biomedical Ethics and Regulation 1
- Co-authors
- Jessica L. Sturtevant (7 shared papers)Sengwee Toh (7 shared papers)Kathleen M. McTigue (7 shared papers)Jane Anau (7 shared papers)Casie Horgan (7 shared papers)R. Yates Coley (7 shared papers)Karen J. Coleman (7 shared papers)David Arterburn (7 shared papers)
- Journals
- Annals of Internal Medicine (2 papers)JAMA Surgery (2 papers)Clinical Epidemiology (1 paper)Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (1 paper)The American journal of geriatric pharmacotherapy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Cheri Janning
10 papers receiving 625 citations
Cheri Janning's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Pharmacy 50
- Surgery 429
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 33
- Physiology 92
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 35
Countries citing papers authored by Cheri Janning
This map shows the geographic impact of Cheri Janning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheri Janning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheri Janning more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cheri Janning
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheri Janning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheri Janning. The network helps show where Cheri Janning may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cheri Janning, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Bariatric Procedures for Weight Loss Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 213 |
| 2 | 2020 | 152 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 83 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 63 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 38 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 9 | Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Bariatric Procedures for Weight Loss | 2018 | 5 |
| 10 | 2014 | 2 |
About Cheri Janning
Cheri Janning is a scholar working on Surgery, Physiology, Statistics and Probability, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pharmacy, having authored 10 papers that have together received 630 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (6 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (1 paper), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (1 paper), Obesity and Health Practices (1 paper), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (1 paper) and Hip and Femur Fractures (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (50 citations), Surgery (429 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (33 citations), Physiology (92 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (35 citations). Cheri Janning has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jessica L. Sturtevant, Sengwee Toh, Kathleen M. McTigue, Jane Anau, Casie Horgan, R. Yates Coley, Karen J. Coleman, David Arterburn, Andrea J. Cook and Neely Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, JAMA Surgery, Clinical Epidemiology, Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science and The American journal of geriatric pharmacotherapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.