Jane Agergaard

20 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers

Jane Agergaard
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Neurology 251
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 67
  • Infectious Diseases 115
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 73
  • Clinical Psychology 85
Replace Mari Terada with:
Mari Terada Japan
Anahita Jafari United States
Taeyoung Choi United States
Ariana Magedson United States
Tahmina Nasserie United States
Rosa María Sánchez Pérez Spain
Pumali Gunasekera United Kingdom
Nadine Jawad Pakistan
Purvi Parikh United States
Sérgio Siqueira Brazil
Jane Agergaard relative to Mari Terada Japan Mari Terada's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Mari Terada · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Agergaard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Agergaard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Agergaard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Agergaard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Agergaard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Agergaard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Agergaard. The network helps show where Jane Agergaard may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Agergaard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Agergaard Line = papers co-authored together Jane Agergaard links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202271
2 202158
3 202146
4 201535
5 202133
6 202229
7 201025
8 202320
9 201217
10 202212
11 202211
12 20239
13 20219
14 20227
15 20235
16
Persistent symptoms in hospitalized patients recovering from COVID-19 in Denmark
20213
17 20132
18
Serological evidence for Chlamydia pneumoniae infection following diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis booster vaccination
20101
19 20221
20 20231

About Jane Agergaard

Jane Agergaard is a scholar working on Neurology, Infectious Diseases, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Psychology and Molecular Biology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (14 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (5 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (5 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (2 papers), Immune responses and vaccinations (2 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (2 papers) and Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (251 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (67 citations), Infectious Diseases (115 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (73 citations) and Clinical Psychology (85 citations). Jane Agergaard has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Guinea-Bissau and Gambia. Frequent co-authors include Lars Østergaard, Christian Wejse, Steffen Leth, Carsten Schade Larsen, Hatice Tankişi, Thomas Harbo, Henning Andersen, Thomas Holm Pedersen, Jesper Damsgaard Gunst and Martin Mølhave. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Neurophysiology, Journal of Clinical Medicine, International Journal of Infectious Diseases, Journal of Medical Virology and Open Forum Infectious Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact