Jan Wunder

1.5k citations
27 papers · 614 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Jan Wunder

27 papers receiving 607 citations

Peers

Jan Wunder
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 296
  • Atmospheric Science 275
  • Global and Planetary Change 306
  • Paleontology 65
  • Insect Science 89
Replace Evan R. Larson with:
Evan R. Larson United States
Gabriele Carraro Switzerland
Jonathan G. A. Lageard United Kingdom
Tim Parshall United States
Michelle Leydet France
Vachel A. Carter United States
Diane L. Delany United States
Daniel Abel‐Schaad Spain
Elizabeth A. Lynch United States
Jennifer L. Clear United Kingdom
Jan Wunder relative to Evan R. Larson United States Evan R. Larson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.9×
Evan R. Larson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Wunder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Wunder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Wunder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Wunder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Wunder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Wunder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Wunder. The network helps show where Jan Wunder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan Wunder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Wunder Line = papers co-authored together Jan Wunder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201482
2 201275
3 201261
4 200849
5 200741
6 201440
7 202137
8 200728
9 200927
10 201526
11 201626
12 201325
13 201319
14 200618
15 201114
16 202012
17 201811
18 20187
19 20195
20
The spread of tree of heaven in Switzerland
20163

About Jan Wunder

Jan Wunder is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science and Ecology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 614 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (10 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers), Forest ecology and management (9 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (9 papers), Forest Management and Policy (6 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (6 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (6 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (296 citations), Atmospheric Science (275 citations), Global and Planetary Change (306 citations), Paleontology (65 citations) and Insect Science (89 citations). Jan Wunder has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, New Zealand and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Harald Bugmann, Christof Bigler, Björn Reineking, Peter Brang, Gretel Boswijk, Jonathan Gray Palmer, Anthony M. Fowler, Marco Conedera, Andrew M. Lorrey and Brigitte Rohner. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Journal of Vegetation Science, Trees, Canadian Journal of Forest Research and Journal of Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact