Jan Schepers

40 papers receiving 594 citations

Peers

Jan Schepers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Computational Mathematics 9
  • Management Science and Operations Research 78
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 40
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 26
  • Spectroscopy 36
Replace Niyousha Hosseinichimeh with:
Niyousha Hosseinichimeh United States
Samiran Ghosh United States
David J. Woodruff United States
William P. Cleveland United States
Simon Grund Germany
Dana P. Turner United States
David J. Rachlin United States
Libo Li United States
Zhehan Jiang United States
Chi Chang United States
Jan Schepers relative to Niyousha Hosseinichimeh United States Niyousha Hosseinichimeh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18×
Niyousha Hosseinichimeh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Schepers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Schepers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Schepers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Schepers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Schepers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Schepers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Schepers. The network helps show where Jan Schepers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan Schepers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Schepers Line = papers co-authored together Jan Schepers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200478
2 201652
3 200842
4 201142
5 201842
6 201835
7 200927
8 200624
9 201722
10 201718
11 201917
12 202217
13 201416
14 202316
15 201315
16 201514
17 201513
18 201111
19 200710
20 201710

About Jan Schepers

Jan Schepers is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Mathematics, Epidemiology, Applied Psychology and Physiology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 620 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research (9 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (4 papers), Tensor decomposition and applications (3 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (3 papers), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (3 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (9 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (78 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (40 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (26 citations) and Spectroscopy (36 citations). Jan Schepers has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Iven Van Mechelen, Rianne Janssen, Eva Ceulemans, Gerjo Kok, Madelon L. Peters, Hans‐Fritz Gramke, Rob A. C. Ruiter, Maurice Theunissen, Marco A. E. Marcus and Joeri Hofmans. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Classification, BioMed Research International, Behavior Research Methods, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis and Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact