Jan Scheffczyk

27 papers receiving 448 citations

Peers

Jan Scheffczyk
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 20
  • Control and Systems Engineering 122
  • Environmental Chemistry 48
  • Artificial Intelligence 152
  • Catalysis 28
Replace Xiaoyun Qin with:
Xiaoyun Qin China
Kun Dong China
Sara Badr Japan
Haitao Mao China
Aiguo Li China
Kazuki Yoshizoe Japan
Lintao Ma China
Nenad Krdzavac United Kingdom
Pranay Anchuri United States
Duo Zhang China
Jan Scheffczyk relative to Xiaoyun Qin China Xiaoyun Qin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.9×
Xiaoyun Qin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Scheffczyk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Scheffczyk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Scheffczyk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Scheffczyk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Scheffczyk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Scheffczyk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Scheffczyk. The network helps show where Jan Scheffczyk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan Scheffczyk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Scheffczyk Line = papers co-authored together Jan Scheffczyk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201665
2 201946
3
BioFrameNet: A Domain-Specific FrameNet Extension with Links to Biomedical Ontologies.
200645
4 201843
5 201639
6
Linking FrameNet to the Suggested Upper Merged Ontology
200635
7
Ontology-based Reasoning about Lexical Resources
200634
8 201929
9 201626
10 200524
11 200418
12 201812
13 20039
14 20037
15 20057
16 20036
17 20185
18 20224
19 20174
20 20033

About Jan Scheffczyk

Jan Scheffczyk is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Biomedical Engineering and Process Chemistry and Technology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 474 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Process Optimization and Integration (12 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (7 papers), Catalysis for Biomass Conversion (6 papers), Software Engineering Research (4 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (3 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (3 papers) and Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (20 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (122 citations), Environmental Chemistry (48 citations), Artificial Intelligence (152 citations) and Catalysis (28 citations). Jan Scheffczyk has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kai O. Leonhard, André Bardow, Michael Ellsworth, Lorenz Fleitmann, Uwe M. Borghoff, Srini Narayanan, Christian M. Jens, Adam Pease, Wolfgang Marquardt and Matthias Lampe. Their work appears in journals such as Chemie Ingenieur Technik, Green Chemistry, Molecular Systems Design & Engineering, Sustainable Energy & Fuels and ACM Transactions on Graphics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact