James W. Ring

2.3k citations
59 papers · 1.7k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

James W. Ring

51 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

James W. Ring
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Building and Construction 542
  • Environmental Engineering 427
  • Atmospheric Science 342
  • Global and Planetary Change 272
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 205
Replace Frank Rutz with:
Frank Rutz Germany
Paul Berdahl United States
ERVIN J. FENYVES United States
Miroslav Kocifaj Slovakia
G. D. Robinson United States
Malcolm J. Campbell United States
Satoru Iizuka Japan
A. W. Harrison Canada
Zhu Mao China
J. F. Sykes Canada
James W. Ring relative to Frank Rutz Germany Frank Rutz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Frank Rutz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James W. Ring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James W. Ring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James W. Ring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James W. Ring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James W. Ring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James W. Ring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James W. Ring. The network helps show where James W. Ring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James W. Ring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James W. Ring Line = papers co-authored together James W. Ring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988417
2 1962307
3 1993192
4 1981117
5 199191
6
Turbulence and draft
198946
7 197442
8 196334
9 199329
10 197227
11 197227
12 196926
13 198225
14 197525
15 195521
16 199920
17 196820
18 200416
19 196416
20 196615

About James W. Ring

James W. Ring is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Aerospace Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Atmospheric Science, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical Coatings and Gratings (8 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (7 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (6 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (6 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (4 papers), History and Developments in Astronomy (4 papers) and Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Building and Construction (542 citations), Environmental Engineering (427 citations), Atmospheric Science (342 citations), Global and Planetary Change (272 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (205 citations). James W. Ring has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Povl Ole Fanger, J. F. Grainger, Arsen Krikor Melikov, Richard de Dear, Hisashi Hanzawa, N. K. Reay, Thomas R. Hicks, Paul D. Atherton, J. Christopher Dainty and Peter A. Egelstaff. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Nature, Planetary and Space Science and Indoor Air.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact