James W. Button

36 papers receiving 535 citations

Peers

James W. Button
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Gender Studies 192
  • Public Administration 44
  • Political Science and International Relations 308
  • Sociology and Political Science 317
  • Social Psychology 108
Replace Dianne M. Pinderhughes with:
Dianne M. Pinderhughes United States
Melissa Deckman United States
Steve Valocchi United States
Jocelyn Elise Crowley United States
Sharyn Roach Anleu Australia
Rebecca E. Klatch United States
Timothy Bledsoe United States
Rene R. Rocha United States
Rebecca Kreitzer United States
Elke Holst Germany
James W. Button relative to Dianne M. Pinderhughes United States Dianne M. Pinderhughes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Dianne M. Pinderhughes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James W. Button

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James W. Button's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James W. Button with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James W. Button more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James W. Button

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James W. Button. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James W. Button. The network helps show where James W. Button may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside James W. Button, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James W. Button Line = papers co-authored together James W. Button links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996131
2 199363
3 198053
4 197943
5 199040
6 199637
7 198933
8 200125
9 200624
10 199321
11 199621
12 199919
13 200215
14 199614
15 199313
16 198912
17 200011
18 197910
19 20039
20 19798

About James W. Button

James W. Button is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Gender Studies, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 39 papers that have together received 666 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (8 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (6 papers), Race, History, and American Society (5 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (5 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (4 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (3 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (3 papers) and Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (192 citations), Public Administration (44 citations), Political Science and International Relations (308 citations), Sociology and Political Science (317 citations) and Social Psychology (108 citations). James W. Button has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Barbara A. Rienzo, Kenneth D. Wald, Walter A. Rosenbaum, David M. Hedge, David V. Snyder, Clayborne Carson, Jiunn‐Jye Sheu, Lawrence J. Friedman, Jason Gainous and David J. Garrow. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of School Health, Social Science Quarterly, American Journal of Political Science, The Journal of Southern History and The Gerontologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact