James W. Button

1k citations
39 papers · 644 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

James W. Button

36 papers receiving 523 citations

Peers

James W. Button
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Gender Studies 115
  • Political Science and International Relations 213
  • Social Psychology 126
  • Speech and Hearing 23
  • Sociology and Political Science 242
Replace Dennis P. Forcese with:
Dennis P. Forcese Canada
Douglas Baer Canada
Gill Jones United Kingdom
Daniel Monk United Kingdom
Raymond K. H. Chan Hong Kong
Carsten Bagge Laustsen Denmark
Kirk Mann United Kingdom
Brandi Blessett United States
Lavinia Stan Canada
Janine Brodie Canada
James W. Button relative to Dennis P. Forcese Canada Dennis P. Forcese's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.7×
Dennis P. Forcese · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James W. Button

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James W. Button's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James W. Button with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James W. Button more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James W. Button

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James W. Button. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James W. Button. The network helps show where James W. Button may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside James W. Button, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James W. Button Line = papers co-authored together James W. Button links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996128
2 199361
3 198054
4 197941
5 199037
6 199635
7 198930
8 200125
9 200622
10 199321
11 199620
12 199919
13 200215
14 199314
15 199613
16 200011
17 197910
18 198910
19 19798
20 19938

About James W. Button

James W. Button is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Speech and Hearing and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 39 papers that have together received 644 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Race, History, and American Society (19 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (6 papers), Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research (6 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (5 papers), Gender, Sexuality, and Education (3 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (3 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (2 papers) and Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (115 citations), Political Science and International Relations (213 citations), Social Psychology (126 citations), Speech and Hearing (23 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (242 citations). James W. Button has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Barbara A. Rienzo, Kenneth D. Wald, Walter A. Rosenbaum, David M. Hedge, Clayborne Carson, Jiunn‐Jye Sheu, Lawrence J. Friedman, Matthew Corrigan, Elliott M. Rudwick and August Meier. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of School Health, Social Science Quarterly, American Journal of Political Science, The Journal of Southern History and Journal of American History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact