James Tong

675 citations
28 papers · 339 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

James Tong

25 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers

James Tong
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Political Science and International Relations 188
  • Sociology and Political Science 159
  • Economics and Econometrics 67
  • Applied Psychology 11
  • Urban Studies 11
Replace Dhananjayan Sriskandarajah with:
Dhananjayan Sriskandarajah United Kingdom
Ronald C. Keith Canada
Tariq Ali United States
Jason Ackleson United States
Patricia L. Hipsher United States
Gerald L. Neuman United States
Nikki Craske Russia
Gregory J. Kasza United States
Eiki Berg Estonia
Steven D. Roper United States
James Tong relative to Dhananjayan Sriskandarajah United Kingdom Dhananjayan Sriskandarajah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Dhananjayan Sriskandarajah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Tong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Tong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Tong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Tong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Tong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Tong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Tong. The network helps show where James Tong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside James Tong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Tong Line = papers co-authored together James Tong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199198
2 200936
3 201530
4 197827
5 198926
6 200224
7 199424
8 202314
9 20109
10 20028
11 20127
12 20176
13 20176
14 19986
15 19874
16 19983
17 20102
18 20192
19
The 1989 democracy movement in China : a preliminary spatial analysis
19941
20 20181

About James Tong

James Tong is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Law, Economics and Econometrics and History, having authored 28 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (12 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (10 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (3 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (3 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers), Regional Economic and Spatial Analysis (1 paper), Legal principles and applications (1 paper) and Religious Freedom and Discrimination (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (188 citations), Sociology and Political Science (159 citations), Economics and Econometrics (67 citations), Applied Psychology (11 citations) and Urban Studies (11 citations). James Tong has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Michel Oksenberg, Kenneth Lieberthal, Stephanie J. Fonda, Ronald K. Poropatich, Gabriella Bulloch, Wei Meng, Mingguang He, Wei Wang, Zongyuan Ge and Meng Xuan. Their work appears in journals such as Asian Survey, The China Quarterly, Religion State & Society, The American Historical Review and Chinese Economy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact