Cong Li
Impact in
- Process Chemistry and Technology top 10%
- Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
Papers in
-
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 6
- Co-authors
- Zhizhong Pan (12 shared papers)Shuai Zhang (2 shared papers)Fulong Wang (5 shared papers)Fang Zheng (2 shared papers)Ning‐hua Cui (2 shared papers)Rongxin Zhang (6 shared papers)Junzhong Lin (7 shared papers)Xuebin Wang (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (3 papers)Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy (3 papers)Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (2 papers)Annals of Translational Medicine (2 papers)Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Cong Li
50 papers receiving 723 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Process Chemistry and Technology 34
- Cancer Research 88
- Ophthalmology 50
- Oncology 122
- Gastroenterology 20
Countries citing papers authored by Cong Li
This map shows the geographic impact of Cong Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cong Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cong Li more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cong Li
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cong Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cong Li. The network helps show where Cong Li may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cong Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 83 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 63 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 47 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 39 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 35 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 11 |
About Cong Li
Cong Li is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Ophthalmology, Oncology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 52 papers that have together received 729 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (6 papers), Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (4 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (3 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (34 citations), Cancer Research (88 citations), Ophthalmology (50 citations), Oncology (122 citations) and Gastroenterology (20 citations). Cong Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Zhizhong Pan, Shuai Zhang, Fulong Wang, Fang Zheng, Ning‐hua Cui, Rongxin Zhang, Junzhong Lin, Xuebin Wang, Feng‐Shou Liu and Lihua Guo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, Annals of Translational Medicine and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.