James Testa
Impact in
-
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
-
- Chaos control and synchronization
Papers in
-
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research 8
-
- Publishing and Scholarly Communication 5
- Academic Writing and Publishing 2
- Co-authors
- Carson D. Jeffries (3 shared papers)G. A. Held (1 shared paper)Alvin M. Despain (1 shared paper)L. M. Falicov (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Physical Review Letters (2 papers)Nature (1 paper)Serials Review (1 paper)Physics Letters A (1 paper)Epidemiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
James Testa
15 papers receiving 526 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 196
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 218
- Mathematical Physics 112
- History and Philosophy of Science 59
- Computer Networks and Communications 44
Countries citing papers authored by James Testa
This map shows the geographic impact of James Testa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Testa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Testa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Testa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Testa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Testa. The network helps show where James Testa may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside James Testa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1982 | 258 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 112 | |
| 3 | The Thomson Scientific journal selection process. | 2006 | 64 |
| 4 | 1998 | 59 | |
| 5 | 1983 | 38 | |
| 6 | 1982 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1985 | 7 | |
| 10 | La base de datos del ISI y su proceso de selección de revistas | 2001 | 6 |
| 11 | The Thomson Scientific journal selection process | 2008 | 6 |
| 12 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1982 | 0 |
About James Testa
James Testa is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, History and Philosophy of Science, Mathematical Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (8 papers), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (5 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (3 papers), Chaos control and synchronization (2 papers), Academic Writing and Publishing (2 papers), Library Science and Information (1 paper), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (1 paper) and Artificial Intelligence in Games (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (196 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (218 citations), Mathematical Physics (112 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (59 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (44 citations). James Testa has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Carson D. Jeffries, G. A. Held, Alvin M. Despain and L. M. Falicov. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature, Serials Review, Physics Letters A and Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.