James Tee

606 citations
13 papers · 395 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Retinal Development and Disorders 6
    • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 2
    • Retinal Diseases and Treatments 2
    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders 1
    • Retinal and Optic Conditions 1

James Tee

12 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers

James Tee
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Ophthalmology 194
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 107
  • Molecular Biology 260
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 24
  • Epidemiology 34
Replace Yoshito Koyanagi with:
Yoshito Koyanagi Japan
Leona Serrano United States
Grace Han United States
Dario Pasquale Mucciolo Italy
Yu Sawada Japan
Rola Ba‐Abbad United Kingdom
Shogo Numa Japan
Yusrah Shweikh United Kingdom
Kelly I. Locke United States
Kirk Stephenson Ireland
James Tee relative to Yoshito Koyanagi Japan Yoshito Koyanagi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Yoshito Koyanagi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Tee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Tee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Tee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Tee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Tee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Tee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Tee. The network helps show where James Tee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Tee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Tee Line = papers co-authored together James Tee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201668
2 201853
3 201739
4 201738
5 201735
6 201833
7 201632
8 201631
9 201726
10 201623
11 202115
12
Assessing cone mosaic disruption in patients with X-linked cone dysfunction
20152
13 20090

About James Tee

James Tee is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (6 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (2 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (1 paper), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Retinal and Optic Conditions (1 paper) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (194 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (107 citations), Molecular Biology (260 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (24 citations) and Epidemiology (34 citations). James Tee has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Michel Michaelides, Andrew R. Webster, Angelos Kalitzeos, Alexander J. Smith, Alison J. Hardcastle, Joseph Carroll, James Bainbridge, Tünde Pető, Richard G. Weleber and D A H Laidlaw. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, American Journal of Ophthalmology, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Retina and Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact