James Tabery

1.2k citations
30 papers · 626 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

James Tabery

27 papers receiving 559 citations

Peers

James Tabery
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • History and Philosophy of Science 159
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 134
  • General Psychology 8
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 75
  • Genetics 157
Replace Maurizio Meloni with:
Maurizio Meloni Australia
Simo Køppe Denmark
Neven Sesardić Hong Kong
Maria Kronfeldner Germany
Stuart Shanker Canada
Rani Lill Anjum Norway
Elselijn Kingma United Kingdom
Uljana Feest Germany
Gary Greenberg United States
Jonathan Livengood United States
James Tabery relative to Maurizio Meloni Australia Maurizio Meloni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Maurizio Meloni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Tabery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Tabery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Tabery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Tabery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Tabery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Tabery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Tabery. The network helps show where James Tabery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Tabery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Tabery Line = papers co-authored together James Tabery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012173
2 200489
3 201455
4 200848
5 201335
6 202334
7 200730
8 200829
9 200724
10 200918
11 200916
12 201515
13 200415
14 20098
15 20157
16 20205
17
Causation in the nature -nurture debate: The case of genotype -environment interaction
20074
18 20144
19 20153
20 20243

About James Tabery

James Tabery is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Genetics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Molecular Biology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (5 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (4 papers), Race, Genetics, and Society (4 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (2 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers) and Disaster Response and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (159 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (134 citations), General Psychology (8 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (75 citations) and Genetics (157 citations). James Tabery has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Teneille R. Brown, Lisa G. Aspinwall, Paul E. Griffiths, Jeremy Freese, Patrick Turley, Daphne Oluwaseun Martschenko, Evelynn M. Hammonds, Dalton Conley, Nathaniel Comfort and Erik Parens. Their work appears in journals such as The Hastings Center Report, Philosophy of Science, Journal of the History of Biology, Biology & Philosophy and New Ideas in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact