James Smith

37 papers receiving 984 citations

Peers

James Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Small Animals 295
  • Animal Science and Zoology 326
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 29
  • Health Informatics 8
  • Genetics 146
Replace Amanda P. Beck with:
Amanda P. Beck United States
D. J. Jones United States
Esther Mahabir Germany
Zhijian Zhou China
Rodolfo J Ricart Arbona United States
Ronnie Chamanza United Kingdom
Jarrod Bailey United Kingdom
Shujuan Wang China
David J. Whittaker United Kingdom
Yong‐Min Kim South Korea
James Smith relative to Amanda P. Beck United States Amanda P. Beck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Amanda P. Beck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Smith. The network helps show where James Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Smith Line = papers co-authored together James Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014118
2 201793
3 199277
4 202171
5 199368
6 198361
7 199158
8 199456
9 201551
10 199342
11 201637
12 201831
13
Regulatory Considerations for Gene Therapy Products in the US, EU, and Japan.
201728
14 201828
15 199228
16 202225
17 201623
18 201621
19 202015
20 201714

About James Smith

James Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology, Oncology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (5 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (4 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (3 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (3 papers), Academic Publishing and Open Access (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers), Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications (2 papers) and Science, Research, and Medicine (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (295 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (326 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (29 citations), Health Informatics (8 citations) and Genetics (146 citations). James Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include G. M. Cronin, David Brindley, H.V. Masey O’Neill, M.R. Bedford, T.H. McCallum, Daniel Prieto‐Alhambra, Andrew Carr, Jennifer Camaradou, Georg A. Holländer and Andrew Carr. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Nature Biotechnology, Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, Acta Orthopaedica and Journal of Emergency Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact