James Sievert
Impact in
- Plant Science top 5%
- Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research
- Food Science top 10%
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
- Food and Agricultural Sciences
Papers in
-
- Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management 11
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 2
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research 1
-
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods 1
- Co-authors
- Mary Lu Arpaia (13 shared papers)David Obenland (10 shared papers)Sue Collin (10 shared papers)Bruce E. Mackey (2 shared papers)Xuan Liu (1 shared paper)Monica A. Madore (1 shared paper)Fayek B. Negm (1 shared paper)Matthew W. Fidelibus (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Postharvest Biology and Technology (7 papers)American Journal of Enology and Viticulture (1 paper)HortScience (1 paper)Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science (1 paper)HortTechnology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
James Sievert
13 papers receiving 578 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Plant Science 493
- Food Science 79
- Analytical Chemistry 45
- Biochemistry 23
- Nutrition and Dietetics 17
Countries citing papers authored by James Sievert
This map shows the geographic impact of James Sievert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Sievert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Sievert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Sievert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Sievert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Sievert. The network helps show where James Sievert may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside James Sievert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 102 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 96 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 92 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 88 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 60 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 57 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 43 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 21 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 13 | Enhancement of Avocado Productivity. Plant Improvement: Selection and Evaluation of Improved Varieties and Rootstocks | 2004 | 4 |
About James Sievert
James Sievert is a scholar working on Plant Science, Food Science, Organic Chemistry, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 13 papers that have together received 614 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (11 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (2 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (1 paper), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (1 paper) and Horticultural and Viticultural Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (493 citations), Food Science (79 citations), Analytical Chemistry (45 citations), Biochemistry (23 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (17 citations). James Sievert has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Mary Lu Arpaia, David Obenland, Sue Collin, Bruce E. Mackey, Xuan Liu, Monica A. Madore, Fayek B. Negm, Matthew W. Fidelibus, Dennis A. Margosan and David C. Slaughter. Their work appears in journals such as Postharvest Biology and Technology, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, HortScience, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science and HortTechnology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.