James Sexton
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
Papers in
-
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies 4
-
- Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior 1
- Co-authors
- Icek Ajzen (1 shared paper)Peter S. Hendricks (3 shared papers)Christopher Timmermann (1 shared paper)Robin Carhart‐Harris (1 shared paper)Matthew B. Wall (1 shared paper)Leor Roseman (1 shared paper)Richard E. Daws (1 shared paper)Bruna Giribaldi (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Psychopharmacology (2 papers)Nature Medicine (1 paper)Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (1 paper)Frontiers in Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
James Sexton
6 papers receiving 458 citations
James Sexton's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Clinical Psychology 324
- Biological Psychiatry 30
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 140
- Toxicology 24
- Applied Psychology 22
Countries citing papers authored by James Sexton
This map shows the geographic impact of James Sexton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Sexton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Sexton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Sexton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Sexton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Sexton. The network helps show where James Sexton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside James Sexton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Increased global integration in the brain after psilocybin therapy for depression Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 271 |
| 2 | Depth of processing, belief congruence, and attitude-behavior correspondence. | 1999 | 86 |
| 3 | 2021 | 61 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 1 |
About James Sexton
James Sexton is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Epidemiology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (4 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (1 paper), Social and Intergroup Psychology (1 paper), Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (1 paper) and Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (324 citations), Biological Psychiatry (30 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (140 citations), Toxicology (24 citations) and Applied Psychology (22 citations). James Sexton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Icek Ajzen, Peter S. Hendricks, Christopher Timmermann, Robin Carhart‐Harris, Matthew B. Wall, Leor Roseman, Richard E. Daws, Bruna Giribaldi, David Erritzøe and David Nutt. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychopharmacology, Nature Medicine, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology and Frontiers in Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.