James Scott

1.5k citations
6 papers · 112 · h-index 4

Impact in

    • Spectroscopy and Laser Applications
    • Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications
    • Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications
    • Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

Papers in

James Scott

5 papers receiving 110 citations

Peers

James Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Spectroscopy 28
  • Materials Chemistry 54
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 35
  • Atmospheric Science 14
  • Biomedical Engineering 20
Replace J. Xu with:
J. Xu Italy
Yimin Li China
Ziwei Yu China
M. Manenti Italy
Tobias Eklund Sweden
J.-W. Tsung Taiwan
Pascal Haefliger Switzerland
M. Born Germany
Alexander Kharakhordin Russia
Alin M. Elena United Kingdom
James Scott relative to J. Xu Italy J. Xu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
J. Xu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Scott. The network helps show where James Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Scott Line = papers co-authored together James Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 199040
2 202032
3 202124
4 202214
5 20182
6 20240

About James Scott

James Scott is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Computational Mechanics, having authored 6 papers that have together received 112 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications (3 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (2 papers), Heat Transfer and Optimization (1 paper), Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (1 paper), Mercury impact and mitigation studies (1 paper), Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (1 paper), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (1 paper) and Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (28 citations), Materials Chemistry (54 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (35 citations), Atmospheric Science (14 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (20 citations). James Scott has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include M.C. Hsiao, Randy L. Vander Wal, Amitabha Sinha, F. Fleming Crim, Qin Li, Kostya Ostrikov, Prashant Sonar, Amandeep Singh, Tim Gould and Ehsan Eftekhari. Their work appears in journals such as Nanoscale Advances, Journal of Visualized Experiments, Advanced Materials Technologies, Sustainable materials and technologies and The Journal of Physical Chemistry A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact