James Roach

500 citations
17 papers · 373 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

James Roach

16 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

James Roach
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 91
  • Surgery 194
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 5
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 64
  • Ophthalmology 19
Replace Jincheng Yang with:
Jincheng Yang China
Victor J. Hassid United States
Nizar Din United Kingdom
Meral Şen Türkiye
Dong Ki Ahn South Korea
Kanika Singh India
Katarı́na Vajdová Slovakia
Kavitha K. Reddy United States
Anagha Shete India
Chi-Jiao Ma China
James Roach relative to Jincheng Yang China Jincheng Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19×
Jincheng Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Roach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Roach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Roach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Roach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Roach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Roach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Roach. The network helps show where James Roach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Roach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Roach Line = papers co-authored together James Roach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1990120
2 198784
3 201664
4 201419
5 201718
6 201516
7 199314
8 201313
9 20166
10 20224
11 20174
12 20233
13 20243
14 20163
15 20241
16 19841
17 20220

About James Roach

James Roach is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, General Health Professions, Ophthalmology and Rheumatology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (3 papers), Quality and Safety in Healthcare (2 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (1 paper), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (1 paper), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (1 paper) and Risk and Safety Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (91 citations), Surgery (194 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (5 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (64 citations) and Ophthalmology (19 citations). James Roach has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Leisa L. Marshall, R J Caudle, Scott L. Blumenthal, Joseph P. Drozda, Alexis Shelokov, Özgür Dede, Patrick Bosch, Michael P. McClincy, James E. Tcheng and Lisa C. Hutchison. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association and Innovation in Aging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact