James Register
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 1%
- Transgenic Plants and Applications
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Plant tissue culture and regeneration
- DNA Repair Mechanisms
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
Papers in
-
- Transgenic Plants and Applications 2
-
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 3
- Plant tissue culture and regeneration 2
- Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms 2
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 1
- Plant Reproductive Biology 1
- Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms 1
- Co-authors
- Ping Chen (4 shared papers)Patrick M. O’Connor (2 shared papers)Stephan K. Grant (3 shared papers)Kenna Lynn Anderes (2 shared papers)Sacha Ninkovic (2 shared papers)Enhong Chen (2 shared papers)Alessandra Blasina (2 shared papers)Chun Luo (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Biochemistry (2 papers)Molecular Breeding (2 papers)Cell (1 paper)Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (1 paper)Molecular Cancer Therapeutics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
James Register
10 papers receiving 820 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Biotechnology 371
- Molecular Biology 761
- Cell Biology 127
- Oncology 183
- Immunology 66
Countries citing papers authored by James Register
This map shows the geographic impact of James Register's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Register with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Register more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Register
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Register. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Register. The network helps show where James Register may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Register, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 307 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 185 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 171 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 121 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 41 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 28 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 21 | |
| 8 | Reversible male sterility: a novel system for the production of hybrid corn. | 1998 | 8 |
| 9 | 1995 | 3 | |
| 10 | Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in corn: early lessons. | 2000 | 2 |
About James Register
James Register is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Molecular Biology, Oncology, Cell Biology and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, having authored 10 papers that have together received 887 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (3 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (2 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (2 papers), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (2 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (1 paper), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (1 paper), Plant Reproductive Biology (1 paper) and Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (371 citations), Molecular Biology (761 citations), Cell Biology (127 citations), Oncology (183 citations) and Immunology (66 citations). James Register has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ping Chen, Patrick M. O’Connor, Stephan K. Grant, Kenna Lynn Anderes, Sacha Ninkovic, Enhong Chen, Alessandra Blasina, Chun Luo, Karen Lundgren and Jill F. Hallin. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemistry, Molecular Breeding, Cell, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.