James Rees

49 papers receiving 769 citations

Peers

James Rees
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Public Administration 106
  • Urban Studies 91
  • Finance 133
  • General Health Professions 241
  • Political Science and International Relations 158
Replace Marjorie Mayo with:
Marjorie Mayo United Kingdom
Jean‐Michel Bonvin Switzerland
Paul Spicker United Kingdom
Catherine Durose United Kingdom
Paul Stubbs Croatia
Ingo Bode Germany
Adalbert Evers Germany
Richard Freeman United Kingdom
Michael Pusey Australia
Miriam Glucksmann United Kingdom
James Rees relative to Marjorie Mayo United Kingdom Marjorie Mayo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Marjorie Mayo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Rees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Rees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Rees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Rees. The network helps show where James Rees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Rees Line = papers co-authored together James Rees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201584
2 201382
3
Towards Co-production in Research with Communities
201169
4 201459
5 201356
6 202251
7 201349
8 201036
9 202027
10 201223
11 201320
12 195418
13
Does sector matter? – understanding the experiences of providers in the work programme
201318
14 201617
15 201617
16 201716
17 201415
18 201914
19
A framework for city-regions working paper 1 mapping city-regions
200614
20 201213

About James Rees

James Rees is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Finance, Education and Public Administration, having authored 53 papers that have together received 823 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Community Development and Social Impact (11 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (11 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (7 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (7 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (6 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (5 papers) and Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (106 citations), Urban Studies (91 citations), Finance (133 citations), General Health Professions (241 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (158 citations). James Rees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Durose, Liz Richardson, Yasminah Beebeejaun, Joanna Richardson, Catherine Needham, Adam Whitworth, Alan Harding, Robin Miller, Rebecca Taylor and Alessandro Sancino. Their work appears in journals such as Policy & Politics, Social Policy and Administration, Public Policy and Administration, Journal of Social Policy and Local Economy The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact