James Rake

1.3k citations
29 papers · 828 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

    • Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms 12
    • Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy 4
    • Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 3

James Rake

27 papers receiving 765 citations

Peers

James Rake
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Pharmaceutical Science 120
  • Toxicology 41
  • Pollution 107
  • Organic Chemistry 228
  • Pharmacology 110
Replace Abhishek Jain with:
Abhishek Jain India
Mervat S. Mohamed Egypt
Weijie Zhao China
Shuhei Zenno Japan
Yoshinori Okamoto Japan
Yongheng Wang China
Isabelle Artaud France
Michael A. Foley United States
Ana Paula Francisco Portugal
Alena Gábelová Slovakia
James Rake relative to Abhishek Jain India Abhishek Jain's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Abhishek Jain · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Rake

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Rake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Rake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Rake more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Rake

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Rake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Rake. The network helps show where James Rake may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Rake, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Rake Line = papers co-authored together James Rake links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996174
2 198095
3 197985
4 199358
5 199739
6 199133
7 199532
8 199530
9 198628
10 199126
11 198024
12 199421
13 198819
14
Pharmacokinetic studies in mice of two new thioxanthenones (183577 and 232759) that showed preferential solid tumor activity.
199718
15 200117
16 197417
17
Phase I pharmacokinetic study of the novel antitumor agent SR233377.
200017
18 199916
19 199815
20 199014

About James Rake

James Rake is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Organic Chemistry, Oncology and Genetics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 828 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (12 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (4 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (3 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (3 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (3 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (3 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (3 papers) and Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (120 citations), Toxicology (41 citations), Pollution (107 citations), Organic Chemistry (228 citations) and Pharmacology (110 citations). James Rake has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Italy. Frequent co-authors include R. G. Eagon, John M. Yarbrough, Thomas H. Corbett, Mark P. Wentland, John J. Rowe, Susan Pugh, Douglas V. Faller, Miguel A. Quiñones, Susan Coughlin and Julie Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, The Journal of Antibiotics, Investigational New Drugs and Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact