James Pilling

784 citations
15 papers · 355 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer 3
    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 3
    • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors 2

James Pilling

14 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

James Pilling
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Molecular Biology 215
  • Biomaterials 37
  • Cell Biology 40
  • Oncology 60
  • Biophysics 12
Replace Katarina Jansson with:
Katarina Jansson Sweden
Kevin Boyé France
Sean Houghton United States
Marta Peretti Italy
Jia‐Jye Lee United States
Claudia Ctortecka United States
Rajshekhar A. Kore United States
Anette Magnussen United Kingdom
Ofer Elhanani Israel
James Pilling relative to Katarina Jansson Sweden Katarina Jansson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Katarina Jansson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Pilling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Pilling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Pilling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Pilling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Pilling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Pilling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Pilling. The network helps show where James Pilling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Pilling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Pilling Line = papers co-authored together James Pilling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201899
2 201656
3 201056
4 201729
5 201724
6 201319
7 201618
8 201916
9 200816
10 201011
11 20108
12 20201
13 20211
14 20211
15 20240

About James Pilling

James Pilling is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cell Biology and Surgery, having authored 15 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (3 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (2 papers), Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (2 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers) and Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (215 citations), Biomaterials (37 citations), Cell Biology (40 citations), Oncology (60 citations) and Biophysics (12 citations). James Pilling has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Singapore and United States. Frequent co-authors include Amy Pointon, C Archer, Thierry Dorval, Christopher E. Pollard, Yinhai Wang, Michael L. Sullivan, Patrick OʼShea, Edward Ainscow, Mounira Djerbi and Ilaria Bellantuono. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, SLAS DISCOVERY, Clinical Cancer Research, Toxicological Sciences and Expert Opinion on Drug Safety.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact