James Penner
Impact in
- Law top 2%
- Legal principles and applications
- Property Rights and Legal Doctrine
-
- Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Papers in
- Law 7
- Legal principles and applications 5
- Property Rights and Legal Doctrine 2
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations 1
- Law in Society and Culture 1
-
- Free Will and Agency 2
- Co-authors
- Devi R. Gnyawalị (1 shared paper)Weiguo Fan (1 shared paper)David Schiff (1 shared paper)Richard Nobles (1 shared paper)Michael Otsuka (1 shared paper)Benjamin Wong (1 shared paper)Wayne A. Morrison (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Information Systems Research (1 paper)The British Journal of Politics and International Relations (1 paper)Modern Law Review (1 paper)Social & Legal Studies (1 paper)Theoretical Inquiries in Law (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SingaporeUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
James Penner
12 papers receiving 197 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Law 63
- Information Systems and Management 37
- Communication 20
- Marketing 24
- Strategy and Management 38
Countries citing papers authored by James Penner
This map shows the geographic impact of James Penner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Penner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Penner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Penner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Penner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Penner. The network helps show where James Penner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside James Penner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 100 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 81 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 4 | Introduction to Jurisprudence and Legal Theory: Commentary and Materials | 2005 | 8 |
| 5 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 12 | Jurisprudence & Legal Theory | 2004 | 1 |
| 13 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 0 |
About James Penner
James Penner is a scholar working on Law, Cognitive Neuroscience, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management and Information Systems, having authored 15 papers that have together received 224 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal principles and applications (5 papers), Free Will and Agency (2 papers), Property Rights and Legal Doctrine (2 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (1 paper), Business Strategy and Innovation (1 paper), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (1 paper), Innovation and Knowledge Management (1 paper) and Law in Society and Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (63 citations), Information Systems and Management (37 citations), Communication (20 citations), Marketing (24 citations) and Strategy and Management (38 citations). James Penner has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Devi R. Gnyawalị, Weiguo Fan, David Schiff, Richard Nobles, Michael Otsuka, Benjamin Wong and Wayne A. Morrison. Their work appears in journals such as Information Systems Research, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Modern Law Review, Social & Legal Studies and Theoretical Inquiries in Law.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.