James Napier

1.5k citations
24 papers · 668 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

James Napier

19 papers receiving 600 citations

Peers

James Napier
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Biophysics 84
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 98
  • Organic Chemistry 282
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 135
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 83
Replace James D. Satterlee with:
James D. Satterlee United States
Tsuyoshi Egawa United States
Anny‐Odile Colson United States
J. Lhoste France
M. Crespo Spain
Trent D. Buckman United States
P. Cavatorta Italy
Xianqi Kong Canada
Joel G. Berger United States
Christopher W. West United Kingdom
James Napier relative to James D. Satterlee United States James D. Satterlee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
James D. Satterlee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Napier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Napier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Napier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Napier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Napier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Napier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Napier. The network helps show where James Napier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Napier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Napier Line = papers co-authored together James Napier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1976237
2 198975
3 199270
4 199146
5 200535
6 199031
7 201727
8 198526
9 198925
10 198325
11 201920
12 198311
13 19797
14 19946
15 19846
16 20175
17 19824
18 20053
19 19953
20
Flannery O'Connor's Last Three: "The Sense of an Ending"
19822

About James Napier

James Napier is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 24 papers that have together received 668 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Radical Photochemical Reactions (4 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (3 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (84 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (98 citations), Organic Chemistry (282 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (135 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (83 citations). James Napier has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert K. Boeckman, Robert B. Perni, Arthur G. Schultz, Gene C. Palmer, R. C. Griffith, Ranjit Ray, H. Steve White, Robert Murray, José H. Woodhead and R. Ravichandran. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Epilepsy Research, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Tetrahedron Letters and Tetrahedron.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact