James Muldoon
Impact in
Papers in
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 6
- Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy 6
-
- Digital Economy and Work Transformation 10
- Co-authors
- Boxi Wú (2 shared papers)James A. Brundage (1 shared paper)Paul Rækstad (1 shared paper)Anthony Pagden (1 shared paper)Peter Hulme (1 shared paper)Mark Graham (2 shared papers)Carl F. List (1 shared paper)Fred A. Baughman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (12 papers)The American Historical Review (3 papers)AI & Society (3 papers)New Media & Society (2 papers)Big Data & Society (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
James Muldoon
80 papers receiving 808 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Classics 68
- History 156
- Political Science and International Relations 256
- Sociology and Political Science 366
- Anthropology 74
Countries citing papers authored by James Muldoon
This map shows the geographic impact of James Muldoon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Muldoon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Muldoon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Muldoon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Muldoon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Muldoon. The network helps show where James Muldoon may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Muldoon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 95 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1969 | 64 | |
| 2 | 1979 | 59 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 58 | |
| 4 | 1972 | 49 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 44 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 40 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 34 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 32 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 31 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 28 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 26 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 25 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 25 | |
| 15 | 1975 | 22 | |
| 16 | Varieties of religious conversion in the Middle Ages | 1997 | 21 |
| 17 | 1995 | 20 | |
| 18 | 1968 | 18 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 20 | 1980 | 17 |
About James Muldoon
James Muldoon is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Surgery and Oncology, having authored 95 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Economy and Work Transformation (10 papers), Diverticular Disease and Complications (8 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (6 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers), Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (6 papers), Sharing Economy and Platforms (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (5 papers) and Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (68 citations), History (156 citations), Political Science and International Relations (256 citations), Sociology and Political Science (366 citations) and Anthropology (74 citations). James Muldoon has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Boxi Wú, James A. Brundage, Paul Rækstad, Anthony Pagden, Peter Hulme, Mark Graham, Carl F. List, Fred A. Baughman, John R. Williams and B. Åsman. Their work appears in journals such as Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, The American Historical Review, AI & Society, New Media & Society and Big Data & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.