Alison Scope

1.8k citations
46 papers · 977 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Alison Scope

42 papers receiving 947 citations

Peers

Alison Scope
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Conservation 133
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 213
  • Clinical Psychology 229
  • Social Psychology 178
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 56
Replace Rina S. Fox with:
Rina S. Fox United States
Julian Elston United Kingdom
Carole Turner United Kingdom
Andrew Hodgkiss United Kingdom
Jennifer Klapper United States
Li‐Yu Hu Taiwan
Deanna M. Golden‐Kreutz United States
Maria McCarthy Australia
Tina Morris United Kingdom
Cheryl Harris Canada
Alison Scope relative to Rina S. Fox United States Rina S. Fox's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Rina S. Fox · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alison Scope

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alison Scope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison Scope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison Scope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alison Scope

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison Scope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison Scope. The network helps show where Alison Scope may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alison Scope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alison Scope Line = papers co-authored together Alison Scope links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008115
2 201698
3 201583
4 201377
5 201161
6 200953
7 201551
8 201048
9 202036
10 201328
11 200928
12 202225
13 200724
14 201623
15 201022
16 201220
17 202219
18 202114
19 201614
20 201713

About Alison Scope

Alison Scope is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 46 papers that have together received 977 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (9 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (6 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (5 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (4 papers), Music Therapy and Health (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Antibiotic Use and Resistance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (133 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (213 citations), Clinical Psychology (229 citations), Social Psychology (178 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (56 citations). Alison Scope has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Matt Stevenson, Elizabeth Milne, David Buckley, Anthea Sutton, Lesley Uttley, Paul Sutcliffe, Andrew Booth, Eva Kaltenthaler, Olivier Pascalis and Scott Makeig. Their work appears in journals such as Health Technology Assessment, Value in Health, BMC Psychiatry, British Journal of Developmental Psychology and Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact