Alison Scope

44 papers receiving 993 citations

Peers

Alison Scope
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Conservation 140
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 206
  • Clinical Psychology 150
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 159
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 75
Replace Julian Elston with:
Julian Elston United Kingdom
Li‐Yu Hu Taiwan
Maria McCarthy Australia
Jennifer Klapper United States
Sang-Yeol Lee South Korea
Jörn von Wietersheim Germany
Carole Turner United Kingdom
Lindsay Jibb Canada
Heather Leutwyler United States
Andrew Hodgkiss United Kingdom
Alison Scope relative to Julian Elston United Kingdom Julian Elston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Julian Elston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alison Scope

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alison Scope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison Scope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison Scope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alison Scope

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison Scope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison Scope. The network helps show where Alison Scope may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alison Scope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alison Scope Line = papers co-authored together Alison Scope links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008123
2 2016104
3 201592
4 201379
5 201163
6 200956
7 201554
8 201050
9 202040
10 201329
11 200928
12 201626
13 202225
14 200724
15 201022
16 202221
17 201220
18 201615
19 202115
20 201314

About Alison Scope

Alison Scope is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics, Psychiatry and Mental health, Conservation and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (7 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (6 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (5 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (5 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (3 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (140 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (206 citations), Clinical Psychology (150 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (159 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (75 citations). Alison Scope has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Matt Stevenson, Elizabeth Milne, David Buckley, Anthea Sutton, Lesley Uttley, Andrew Booth, Paul Sutcliffe, Eva Kaltenthaler, Olivier Pascalis and Scott Makeig. Their work appears in journals such as Health Technology Assessment, Value in Health, BMC Psychiatry, British Journal of Developmental Psychology and Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact