James Michael

2.2k citations
109 papers · 1.4k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

James Michael

96 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

James Michael
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Computational Mechanics 431
  • Spectroscopy 268
  • Mechanics of Materials 354
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 79
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 313
Replace Robert Louis Stevenson with:
Robert Louis Stevenson United States
Michael Bortz Germany
Andrew D. Cutler United States
R. Gupta United States
L. Nemes Hungary
Eiichi Takahashi Japan
John Brophy United States
Michael Thompson United States
U. Zimmermann Germany
James Michael relative to Robert Louis Stevenson United States Robert Louis Stevenson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.0×
Robert Louis Stevenson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Michael

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Michael's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Michael with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Michael more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Michael

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Michael. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Michael. The network helps show where James Michael may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Michael, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Michael Line = papers co-authored together James Michael links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 109 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011198
2 2011186
3 1993129
4 201364
5 201758
6 201055
7 201846
8 201343
9 201238
10 201434
11 202032
12 200231
13 201528
14 201925
15 199724
16 199823
17 201223
18 202122
19 201918
20 201115

About James Michael

James Michael is a scholar working on Mechanics of Materials, Computational Mechanics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Spectroscopy and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 109 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and flame dynamics (23 papers), Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (17 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (17 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (15 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (13 papers), Energetic Materials and Combustion (13 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (10 papers) and Laser Design and Applications (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (431 citations), Spectroscopy (268 citations), Mechanics of Materials (354 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (79 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (313 citations). James Michael has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include Richard B. Miles, Arthur Dogariu, Gary Yukl, Matthew R. Edwards, Marlan O. Scully, Terrence R. Meyer, Chloe E. Dedic, Travis R. Sippel, Tat Loon Chng and Mikhail N. Shneider. Their work appears in journals such as Combustion and Flame, Optics Letters, Physics of Fluids, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer and Multinational Business Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact