Chloe E. Dedic

543 citations
47 papers · 380 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Chloe E. Dedic

40 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers

Chloe E. Dedic
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Biophysics 137
  • Computational Mechanics 223
  • Spectroscopy 167
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 45
  • Mechanics of Materials 92
Replace P. Bouchardy with:
P. Bouchardy France
W. Clauß Germany
Paul J. Wrzesinski United States
Sameer Naik United States
Kraig Frederickson United States
Gary L. Switzer United States
Laurence R. Boedeker United States
Mark A. Woodmansee United States
P. Magre France
Emil Nordström Sweden
Chloe E. Dedic relative to P. Bouchardy France P. Bouchardy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
P. Bouchardy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chloe E. Dedic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chloe E. Dedic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chloe E. Dedic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chloe E. Dedic more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chloe E. Dedic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chloe E. Dedic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chloe E. Dedic. The network helps show where Chloe E. Dedic may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chloe E. Dedic, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chloe E. Dedic Line = papers co-authored together Chloe E. Dedic links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201262
2 201758
3 201448
4 201540
5 201328
6
Non-Intrusive Measurement Techniques for Flow Characterization of Hypersonic Wind Tunnels
201827
7 201918
8 202114
9 20227
10 20177
11 20167
12 20205
13 20195
14 20205
15 20244
16 20124
17 20233
18 20223
19 20233
20 20233

About Chloe E. Dedic

Chloe E. Dedic is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials, Aerospace Engineering, Spectroscopy and Biophysics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and flame dynamics (30 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (15 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (13 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (12 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (11 papers), Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (7 papers), Rocket and propulsion systems research (7 papers) and Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (137 citations), Computational Mechanics (223 citations), Spectroscopy (167 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (45 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (92 citations). Chloe E. Dedic has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Terrence R. Meyer, Joseph D. Miller, James Michael, Sukesh Roy, James R. Gord, Paul M. Danehy, Thomas Seeger, Alfred Leipertz, Ryan Thompson and Robert C. Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Optics, Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, Optica, Optics Letters and AIAA Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact