James Mark

414 citations
13 papers · 107 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

James Mark

11 papers receiving 88 citations

Peers

James Mark
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • History 33
  • Space and Planetary Science 3
  • Political Science and International Relations 48
  • Sociology and Political Science 80
  • Cultural Studies 8
Replace Vejas Gabriel Liulevicius with:
Vejas Gabriel Liulevicius United States
Edward Ousselin United States
Sean McMeekin United States
Manuel Borutta Germany
Hasan Kayalı United States
Matthew Stibbe United Kingdom
Sarah Cole United States
Johannes Paulmann Germany
Frank Tallett United Kingdom
Miguel Bandeira Jerónimo Portugal
James Mark relative to Vejas Gabriel Liulevicius United States Vejas Gabriel Liulevicius's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Vejas Gabriel Liulevicius · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Mark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Mark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Mark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Mark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Mark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Mark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Mark. The network helps show where James Mark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside James Mark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Mark Line = papers co-authored together James Mark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201923
2 201518
3 201518
4 201117
5 201512
6 20056
7 20194
8 20063
9 20173
10 20112
11 20191
12 20210
13 20190

About James Mark

James Mark is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 13 papers that have together received 107 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (10 papers), Communism, Protests, Social Movements (8 papers), European history and politics (7 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (4 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (2 papers), Historical and Political Studies (1 paper), French Historical and Cultural Studies (1 paper) and Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (33 citations), Space and Planetary Science (3 citations), Political Science and International Relations (48 citations), Sociology and Political Science (80 citations) and Cultural Studies (8 citations). James Mark has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hungary and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Péter Apor, Robert Gildéa, Maud Anne Bracke, Florian Bieber, Paul Betts and Idesbald Goddeeris. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Contemporary History, East Central Europe, Cultural and Social History, Contemporary European History and The Journal of Modern History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact