James L. Smith

48 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

James L. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Finance 555
  • General Energy 40
  • Economics and Econometrics 659
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 158
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 280
Replace Ralf Becker with:
Ralf Becker United Kingdom
Hiroshi Yamada Japan
Mauro Costantini Italy
Francesco Dalla Longa Netherlands
Guochang Xu China
Reiner Kümmel Germany
Amos Zemel Israel
Steve Thomas United States
Robert A. Levy United States
Jing Cynthia Wu United States
James L. Smith relative to Ralf Becker United Kingdom Ralf Becker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
Ralf Becker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James L. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James L. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James L. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James L. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James L. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James L. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James L. Smith. The network helps show where James L. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James L. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James L. Smith Line = papers co-authored together James L. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988505
2 2009178
3 197866
4 199356
5 199341
6 199831
7 199030
8 200127
9 198423
10 198122
11 201722
12 199221
13 201320
14 198717
15 201215
16 201414
17 201713
18 200512
19 202110
20 197910

About James L. Smith

James L. Smith is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Economics and Econometrics, Finance and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Market Dynamics and Volatility (16 papers), Global Energy and Sustainability Research (16 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (11 papers), Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (10 papers), Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (9 papers), Natural Resources and Economic Development (8 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (8 papers) and Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (555 citations), General Energy (40 citations), Economics and Econometrics (659 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (158 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (280 citations). James L. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Saudi Arabia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include James L. Paddock, Daniel R. Siegel, Richard Geoffrey Haire, Milton J. Trlica, Gary D. Libecap, Allen C. Larson, W. L. Hults, G. H. Kwei, Axel Pierru and John D. Stednick. Their work appears in journals such as The Energy Journal, Energy Economics, Physica C Superconductivity, Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy and Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact