James L. Borke

85 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

James L. Borke
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Oral Surgery 244
  • Orthodontics 232
  • Sensory Systems 127
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 274
  • Nephrology 151
Replace Sol Bernick with:
Sol Bernick United States
Johan N.M. Heersche Canada
Takahísa Sasaki Japan
Peter J. Nijweide Netherlands
Kenji Hata Japan
Sadakazu Ejiri Japan
Isabel R. Orriss United Kingdom
Leesa M. Barone United States
Brian Lee Foster United States
Jinhu Xiong United States
James L. Borke relative to Sol Bernick United States Sol Bernick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Sol Bernick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James L. Borke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James L. Borke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James L. Borke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James L. Borke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James L. Borke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James L. Borke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James L. Borke. The network helps show where James L. Borke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James L. Borke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James L. Borke Line = papers co-authored together James L. Borke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989129
2 2004110
3 1989105
4 2008105
5 1987104
6 201192
7 200872
8 199770
9
Chemoprevention of oral cancer by green tea.
200257
10 198853
11 198950
12 200150
13 200750
14 200750
15 201049
16 200147
17 198845
18 199043
19
Chemopreventive effects of green tea polyphenols correlate with reversible induction of p57 expression.
200243
20 201542

About James L. Borke

James L. Borke is a scholar working on Oral Surgery, Orthodontics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology and Oncology, having authored 86 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (9 papers), Tea Polyphenols and Effects (8 papers), Bone health and treatments (8 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (8 papers), Bone Metabolism and Diseases (7 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (7 papers), Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (6 papers) and ATP Synthase and ATPases Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oral Surgery (244 citations), Orthodontics (232 citations), Sensory Systems (127 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (274 citations) and Nephrology (151 citations). James L. Borke has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Japan. Frequent co-authors include John T. Penniston, Rajiv Kumar, Jack Chung-Kai Yu, Anil Kumar Verma, Ariel J. Caride, Jason M. Mailhot, David Henry Pashley, Junzaburo Minami, Stephen Hsu and George S. Schuster. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Dental Research, Archives of Oral Biology, Journal of Periodontology, The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal and International Endodontic Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact