James Kempf

3.4k citations
118 papers · 1.7k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

James Kempf

113 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

James Kempf
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Spectroscopy 638
  • Computer Networks and Communications 689
  • Biophysics 141
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 238
  • Materials Chemistry 398
Replace Puneet Ahuja with:
Puneet Ahuja France
Hideaki Kimura Japan
Lemin Li China
Joseph A. Bank United States
Pavel Mach Czechia
Song‐Ho Chong South Korea
Shantenu Jha United States
Daniel L. Ensign United States
Yuri Alexeev United States
Michael Harder Canada
James Kempf relative to Puneet Ahuja France Puneet Ahuja's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Puneet Ahuja · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Kempf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Kempf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Kempf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Kempf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Kempf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Kempf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Kempf. The network helps show where James Kempf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Kempf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Kempf Line = papers co-authored together James Kempf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 118 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012118
2 2012109
3 201581
4 200773
5 200671
6 200264
7 202056
8 197445
9 197240
10 200240
11 201237
12 201836
13 200435
14 201234
15 202132
16 201130
17 201530
18 201729
19 202129
20 197426

About James Kempf

James Kempf is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Spectroscopy, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 118 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (41 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (23 papers), IPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security (21 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (18 papers), Software-Defined Networks and 5G (16 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (11 papers), Mobile Agent-Based Network Management (11 papers) and Caching and Content Delivery (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (638 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (689 citations), Biophysics (141 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (238 citations) and Materials Chemistry (398 citations). James Kempf has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include J. Patrick Loria, H. W. Spieß, H. Zimmermann, Matthew L. Hirsch, U. Haeberlen, Juyeon Jung, Mélanie Rosay, Pontus Sköldström, Attila Takács and Nicole S. Sampson. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Journal of Magnetic Resonance, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, Wireless Personal Communications and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact