James Horley

808 citations
35 papers · 516 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

James Horley

34 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers

James Horley
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 34
  • Health 83
  • Social Psychology 223
  • Applied Psychology 47
  • Clinical Psychology 165
Replace Yoko Hayashi with:
Yoko Hayashi Canada
William J. Sauer United States
Lu Luo Taiwan
Edward A. Powers United States
Chris Wellin United States
Rosa Marina Afonso Portugal
Maureen Blankemeyer United States
Anthony R. Bardo United States
Eyal Gringart Australia
Tess O’Brien Canada
James Horley relative to Yoko Hayashi Canada Yoko Hayashi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Yoko Hayashi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Horley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Horley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Horley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Horley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Horley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Horley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Horley. The network helps show where James Horley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside James Horley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Horley Line = papers co-authored together James Horley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995146
2 198473
3 198546
4 199421
5 198819
6 199119
7 198818
8 201117
9 199216
10 201215
11 199115
12 200015
13 200814
14 201410
15
Sexual Offenders: Personal Construct Theory and Deviant Sexual Behaviour
20089
16 19958
17 20166
18 20015
19 20004
20 19964

About James Horley

James Horley is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Health and Gender Studies, having authored 35 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive and psychological constructs research (10 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (7 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (6 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (5 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (3 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (3 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (34 citations), Health (83 citations), Social Psychology (223 citations), Applied Psychology (47 citations) and Clinical Psychology (165 citations). James Horley has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Brian R. Little, Vernon L. Quinsey, Barbara A. Carroll, Lloyd Strickland, Robert L. Glueckauf and Alex C. Michalos. Their work appears in journals such as Social Indicators Research, The Journal of Sex Research, Sexuality & Culture, Journal of Constructivist Psychology and International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact