James Harley

19 papers receiving 230 citations

Peers

James Harley
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 81
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 51
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 10
  • Music 19
  • Management Science and Operations Research 61
Replace Vivek Kant with:
Vivek Kant India
Javier Mora Serrano Spain
Ivan Mačužić Serbia
JungHo Jeon United States
Paula Savioja Finland
Ziyao Zhang United States
Peter Hughes United Kingdom
Scott S. Potter United States
Linda J. Sorensen United Kingdom
Ifeanyi Okpala United States
James Harley relative to Vivek Kant India Vivek Kant's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Vivek Kant · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Harley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Harley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Harley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Harley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Harley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Harley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Harley. The network helps show where James Harley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside James Harley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Harley Line = papers co-authored together James Harley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202060
2 201538
3 201534
4 200722
5 201218
6 200215
7 201713
8
Xenakis: His Life in Music
200411
9 201810
10 19949
11 20048
12 20168
13 19956
14
Using participatory video to understand subcontracted construction workers' safety rule violations
20163
15 20112
16 20001
17 19981
18 20091
19 20011
20 20041

About James Harley

James Harley is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Music, Social Psychology and Signal Processing, having authored 26 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music Technology and Sound Studies (7 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (5 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (4 papers), Construction Project Management and Performance (3 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (3 papers), Facilities and Workplace Management (3 papers), Music and Audio Processing (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (81 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (51 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (10 citations), Music (19 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (61 citations). James Harley has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Helen Lingard, Tracy Cooke, Derek H.T. Walker, Anthony Mills, Sarah Pink, Ruwini Edirisinghe, David A. Guss, Edward M. Castillo, Sarah Pink and Rita Peihua Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Music Journal, Pediatric Emergency Care, Safety Science, Contemporary Music Review and Construction Management and Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact