James Halbrook
Impact in
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Redox biology and oxidative stress
- Aging top 10%
Papers in
-
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 9
- Redox biology and oxidative stress 2
- Genetics 2
- Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology 2
- Co-authors
- Bruce Demple (2 shared papers)Stuart Linn (1 shared paper)Jac A. Nickoloff (2 shared papers)Merl F. Hoekstra (4 shared papers)Chris Allen (1 shared paper)Scott Peterson (1 shared paper)Hai Le Trong (1 shared paper)Bruce E. Lehnert (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Molecular and Cellular Biology (2 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (2 papers)Journal of Clinical Investigation (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)Cancer Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James Halbrook
11 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Molecular Biology 923
- Aging 18
- Genetics 237
- Oncology 157
- Cancer Research 75
Countries citing papers authored by James Halbrook
This map shows the geographic impact of James Halbrook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Halbrook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Halbrook more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Halbrook
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Halbrook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Halbrook. The network helps show where James Halbrook may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Halbrook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1983 | 375 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 210 | |
| 3 | 1983 | 200 | |
| 4 | Interactive competition between homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining. | 2003 | 146 |
| 5 | 2005 | 116 | |
| 6 | DNA-dependent protein kinase inhibitors as drug candidates for the treatment of cancer. | 2003 | 80 |
| 7 | 1999 | 79 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 71 | |
| 9 | 1989 | 42 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 19 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 8 |
About James Halbrook
James Halbrook is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Physiology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (9 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (2 papers), Redox biology and oxidative stress (2 papers), Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (1 paper), Effects of Radiation Exposure (1 paper), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper) and Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (923 citations), Aging (18 citations), Genetics (237 citations), Oncology (157 citations) and Cancer Research (75 citations). James Halbrook has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Bruce Demple, Stuart Linn, Jac A. Nickoloff, Merl F. Hoekstra, Chris Allen, Scott Peterson, Hai Le Trong, Bruce E. Lehnert, David J. Chen and Tracy Ruscetti. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular and Cellular Biology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Clinical Investigation, Nature and Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.