James Gladstone

24 papers receiving 532 citations

Peers

James Gladstone
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Public Administration 73
  • Safety Research 129
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 21
  • Demography 146
  • Clinical Psychology 179
Replace Stacey Kolomer with:
Stacey Kolomer United States
Joan Levy Zlotnik United States
Tal Araten‐Bergman Israel
Janna C. Heyman United States
Rebecca L. Hegar United States
Tamara Fuller United States
Youjung Lee United States
Parvaneh Rabiee United Kingdom
Joan Rapaport United Kingdom
Paul H. Ephross United States
James Gladstone relative to Stacey Kolomer United States Stacey Kolomer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Stacey Kolomer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Gladstone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Gladstone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Gladstone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Gladstone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Gladstone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Gladstone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Gladstone. The network helps show where James Gladstone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside James Gladstone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Gladstone Line = papers co-authored together James Gladstone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201170
2 201653
3 201446
4 200645
5 200041
6 200936
7 198834
8 199532
9 200229
10 199827
11 198924
12 201723
13 200221
14 200721
15 200719
16 199518
17 198715
18 19918
19
Adoption Disclosure Counseling as Perceived by Adult Adoptees and Biological Relatives.
19926
20 20124

About James Gladstone

James Gladstone is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Demography, Safety Research and Clinical Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 581 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (14 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (8 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (6 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (4 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (3 papers) and Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (73 citations), Safety Research (129 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (21 citations), Demography (146 citations) and Clinical Psychology (179 citations). James Gladstone has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Koster, Gary C. Dumbrill, Bruce Leslie, Ralph Adams Brown, Sherry L. Dupuis, Afisi Ismaila, Michelle Young, Anne Westhues, Michelle Charles and Tom Reynolds. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, Children and Youth Services Review, The Gerontologist, Child welfare and Ageing and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact