James Giles

820 citations
40 papers · 189 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

James Giles

26 papers receiving 125 citations

Peers

James Giles
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Literature and Literary Theory 36
  • Philosophy 26
  • Clinical Psychology 44
  • Social Psychology 40
  • Cultural Studies 16
Replace Ariel Glucklich with:
Ariel Glucklich United States
Rainer María Rilke
Dalia Judovitz United States
G. W. Pigman United States
Gilbert Lewis United Kingdom
Leo Tolstoy United States
J. B. Pontalis
Rüdiger Safranski United States
Lewis D. Wurgaft
Irving Singer United States
James Giles relative to Ariel Glucklich United States Ariel Glucklich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ariel Glucklich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Giles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Giles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Giles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Giles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Giles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Giles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Giles. The network helps show where James Giles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside James Giles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Giles Line = papers co-authored together James Giles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199329
2 200619
3 201316
4
The Nature of Sexual Desire
200416
5 199413
6 201912
7
No Self to be Found: The Search for Personal Identity
199711
8 19987
9 19946
10 20086
11 19965
12 20124
13 20104
14
Kierkegaard and freedom
20003
15 20043
16 19693
17
Allegory in Chesnutt's Marrow of Tradition.
19843
18 19733
19 19743
20 20152

About James Giles

James Giles is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and History, having authored 40 papers that have together received 189 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American and British Literature Analysis (6 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (4 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), American Literature and Culture (2 papers), Modern American Literature Studies (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (36 citations), Philosophy (26 citations), Clinical Psychology (44 citations), Social Psychology (40 citations) and Cultural Studies (16 citations). James Giles has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Guam and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Kevin R. McNamara, Lydia R. Cooper, Steven Frye, John M. Dudley, John T. O’Brien and Jerome Klinkowitz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, College English, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, American Literature and Resources for American Literary Study.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact