James Geller

3.1k citations
223 papers · 2.3k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

James Geller

216 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

James Geller
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Artificial Intelligence 1.4k
  • Health Information Management 89
  • Information Systems 421
  • Molecular Biology 1.2k
  • Language and Linguistics 173
Replace Robert Gaizauskas with:
Robert Gaizauskas United Kingdom
Paloma Martı́nez Spain
Pierre Zweigenbaum France
Sanda M. Harabagiu United States
Anna Rumshisky United States
Michael Elhadad Israel
Valentin Tablan United Kingdom
Jon Patrick Australia
Lucy Vanderwende United States
Filip Ginter Finland
James Geller relative to Robert Gaizauskas United Kingdom Robert Gaizauskas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Robert Gaizauskas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Geller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Geller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Geller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Geller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Geller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Geller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Geller. The network helps show where James Geller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Geller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Geller Line = papers co-authored together James Geller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 223 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015108
2 200682
3 201369
4 201445
5 201140
6 201136
7 199136
8 200336
9 201433
10 200932
11
Auditing the UMLS for redundant classifications.
200232
12 200229
13 199928
14 201727
15 199927
16 201727
17 199826
18 200726
19 200525
20 201625

About James Geller

James Geller is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications and Signal Processing, having authored 223 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semantic Web and Ontologies (126 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (110 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (30 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (23 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (20 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (20 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (17 papers) and Topic Modeling (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (1.4k citations), Health Information Management (89 citations), Information Systems (421 citations), Molecular Biology (1.2k citations) and Language and Linguistics (173 citations). James Geller has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Yehoshua Perl, Michael Halper, Soon Ae Chun, Xiang Ji, Christopher Ochs, Huanying Gu, Gai Elhanan, Zhe He, Yugyung Lee and Zhi Wei. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making and Data & Knowledge Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact