James G. Fleming

529 citations
22 papers · 413 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

James G. Fleming

19 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers

James G. Fleming
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 181
  • Biomedical Engineering 226
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 221
  • Mechanics of Materials 69
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 12
Replace Д. А. Усанов with:
Д. А. Усанов Russia
Cong Zhao China
R. Hendel United States
T. Matsuda Japan
Chunxiao Tang China
Kei Kuwabara Japan
S. Yanagisawa Japan
Yasuhisa Ōmura Japan
Yuji Kato Japan
Andrea Polimadei Italy
James G. Fleming relative to Д. А. Усанов Russia Д. А. Усанов's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Д. А. Усанов · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James G. Fleming

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James G. Fleming's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James G. Fleming with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James G. Fleming more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James G. Fleming

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James G. Fleming. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James G. Fleming. The network helps show where James G. Fleming may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James G. Fleming, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James G. Fleming Line = papers co-authored together James G. Fleming links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200982
2 200768
3 200752
4 196649
5 200341
6 200428
7 200428
8 200015
9 200714
10 19937
11 19987
12 19995
13 20074
14 20034
15 19992
16 19952
17 19961
18 19951
19 19961
20 19991

About James G. Fleming

James G. Fleming is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Materials Chemistry, having authored 22 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (6 papers), Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies (5 papers), Photonic Crystals and Applications (5 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (4 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (4 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (2 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (2 papers) and Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (181 citations), Biomedical Engineering (226 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (221 citations), Mechanics of Materials (69 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (12 citations). James G. Fleming has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Roy H. Olsson, Melanie R. Tuck, Michael S. Baker, Shawn-Yu Lin, Ihab El-Kady, Amnon Yariv, Yong Xu, Mehmet F. Su, Bert K.B. Lum and Pitambar Somani. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Letters, Optics Express, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, Journal of The Electrochemical Society and Sensors and Actuators A Physical.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact